The above-said theory vividly reflects Lee's sycophancy toward the U.S. and his national nihilism characterized by worship and submission to the U.S., extreme rejection and disregard of his compatriots as well as his political ignorance, the article notes, and goes on:

The successive puppet rulers in south Korea have pursued the policy of kowtowing to the U.S. talking about "alliance" with the U.S. But there was no such sycophant and spiritless traitor to the nation as Lee Myung Bak who openly chose the theory of giving precedence to foreign forces as its political watchword while placing them above the fellow countrymen.

The article cites following facts to prove that the Lee regime committed such unpardonable acts of treachery as throwing south Korea into deeper abyss of U.S. domination and subjugation and putting the inter-Korean relations to stalemate, in zealous pursuance of sycophancy and treachery and the moves for confrontation with the DPRK, guided by the above-said theory:

The group of traitors is selling off the dignity and interests of the nation, lock, stock and barrel, after leaving south Korea to the tender mercy of the U.S., guided by the above-said theory and under the signboard of "strategic alliance in the 21st century" based on the theory.

It is traitor Lee's view on the U.S. that south Korea can not exist without the U.S. and it can "prosper" only when it is backed by the U.S.

Lee is bereft of elementary morality and an iota of reason and national conscience as he is keen on serving the U.S. This traitor is subordinating the inter-Korean relations to the south Korea-U.S. relations while putting foreign forces above compatriots.

He is employing every possible trick, much afraid that the U.S. may join hands with the DPRK, pushing south Korea aside.

He asserts that the improved U.S.-south Korea relations would be beneficial to the inter-Korean relations. This is nothing but sheer nonsense reminding one of a behavior welcoming a robber to one's house.

Lee Myung Bak does not know much about philosophy and politics. If he has any, it is nothing but "pragmatic diplomacy" centering on the U.S., a copy of U.S.-style "pragmatism," and the policy of confrontation with fellow countrymen, pursuant to the U.S. DPRK strategy for aggression.

The "theory of giving priority to south Korea-U.S. relations" advocated by him is little short of his pledge to adopt it as the top priority goal of his domestic and foreign policy to act a servant for the U.S. in executing its policy of a war of aggression and a shock brigade in carrying out its policy for a war of aggression against the DPRK.

The theory, indeed, is the thrice-cursed, despicable and wicked one for exterminating the nation as it is aimed at bringing only disasters to the nation.

No wonder south Koreans are becoming increasingly critical of the group of traitors' crimes.

Gone are the days never to return when traitors could prolong their remaining days by relying on the U.S.

Lee Myung Bak would be well advised to face up to the trend of the world and drop his anachronistic policy of giving priority to outsiders, though belatedly.

Giving precedence to outsiders is certain to lead the nation to ruin, the article says, stressing that the criminal theory is bound to go bankrupt due to the strong trend of the June 15 era of independent reunification making a dynamic advance under the banner of "By our nation itself."