Minju Joson Thursday says this in its signed commentary.

It goes on:

The Japanese reactionaries laid down "the three principles of arms export" in 1967 in a bid to calm down the domestic and foreign criticism of their moves to revive militarism and make Japan appear a "pacifist state" before the world community.

These principles bar Japan, in principle, from conducting any exchange with other countries in the fields of high military technology and the production of cutting-edge military hardware.

That is why the Japanese reactionaries are seeking to do away with the "three principles of arms export," a hurdle lying in the way of realizing their wild ambition for reinvasion, in a bid to modernize the "Self-Defence Forces (SDF)" with greater ease.

What should not be overlooked is that the theory on "preemptive attack" on the DPRK is now being advocated in Japan.

It is not Japan but the DPRK that has to draw attention to the "theory of preemptive attack."

The reality clearly proves once again what right option the DPRK took to bolster up the capability for self-defence under the banner of Songun.

The army and people of the DPRK are following with a high degree of vigilance the evermore undisguised moves of the Japanese reactionaries for reinvasion.

They are filled with the determination to mete out a thousand-fold punishment to them should they invade their country even an inch.

The Japanese reactionaries would be well advised to halt their rash acts, mindful that the above-said moves for reinvasion are bound to lead to their self-destruction, warns the commentary.