The 14th issue of Proretaren, the organ of the Communist Party in Sweden, carried an article titled "Who is a provocateur?" It accused the U.S. of prodding the UN Security Council into faking up the "resolutions on sanctions" against the DPRK and then staging provocative war exercises for aggression in south Korea.

The U.S. has refused to accept the DPRK's proposal for concluding a peace treaty for 60 years since the Armistice Agreement was signed, the article said, and went on:

The DPRK knows well through what happened in Iraq and Libya that any concession means death.

Under this situation what type of guys criticizers of the DPRK's strong countermeasures are?

The Sweden-Korea Friendship Association posted an article titled "Who is threatened by whom on the Korean Peninsula?" on its website on April 6.

What happened in the last Korean War and other countries proved that it is a trite method of the U.S. to provoke a war of aggression by abusing the UN, the article said, and went on:

The DPRK's countermeasures against the UNSC's "resolutions on sanctions" are for establishing a fair international order and protecting world peace and protesting against big powers' evermore undisguised arbitrary and unilateral practices and UN, its function getting titular.

The UN should help its member states exercise their rights and perform their missions.