She made no scruple of making such rubbish as "the DPRK cannot succeed in its new strategic line on simultaneously pushing forward economic construction and the building of nuclear force and "it is like a "fresh gambling." Her remarks are part of her mud-slinging aimed at hurting the dignity of its supreme leadership.

She made such remarks as a follow-up of her outbursts calling for "a change" in the DPRK, decrying its line as an "impossible goal" during her U.S junket, not content with talking nonsense that "nukes would not help residents eke out their living."

This is a blatant challenge to the DPRK's great inheritance of its earlier line at a new high stage. What she uttered only betrays her political ignorance and confrontation nature as a sycophant who is unable to shape even a simple strategy for carving out the destiny of the nation.

The DPRK's new line is a strategic one laid down to protect the sovereignty, dignity, peace and prosperity of the nation under the tense political and military situation prevailing on the Korean Peninsula created by foreign forces.

Had the chief executive of south Korea had even an iota of awareness of being a member of the nation, she would not have misjudged the will of the DPRK, which adopted the new line as a state strategy and codified it under such hard conditions.

Sovereignty is what keeps the country and nation alive. It is hard to protect it only by talking. If a country is weak in its national power, it is bound to be deprived of everything by aggressors and such nation is bound to become slaves whose fate is no better than a dog in the house of grief. This is the bitter lesson taught by history and reality.

Only when the DPRK, a small country surrounded by big powers, holds fast to the new strategic line, can it resolutely beat back foreign aggression and interference, achieve national reunification, the cherished desire of the nation, and enjoy prosperity for the generations to come.

Being president of south Korea, she ought to know at least about the logical outcome stemming from the geopolitical position of this land where she lives and the international relations of dynamics.

Her behavior of taking issue with the just line for the nation chosen by the fellow countrymen and unhesitatingly hurting the dignity of the supreme leadership of the DPRK, bereft of this elementary perception, makes it clear that she has made up her mind to pursue confrontation with compatriots and push the inter-Korean relations to a collapse, dancing to her American master's tune of trumpeting about denuclearization aimed to disarm the DPRK.

She is going beyond the line which she should not do in the inter-Korean relations as she is attaching greater importance to outsiders than fellow countrymen just as traitor Lee Myung Bak did and following in his footsteps.

The south Korean authorities would be well advised to ponder over the adverse impact their irresponsible remarks would have on their own fate and the destiny of the nation.