U.S. Congress is growing increasingly discontent with the U.S. policy toward the DPRK, querying "How long the strategic patience will last?", "Should we be patient for hundreds, thousands of years?" and "Should we be patient for good?"

Even the U.S. institutions for policy studies are becoming increasingly critical of its policies, noting that the U.S. policy has neither strategy nor clear tactical goal and they feel frustration in Obama's policy toward the DPRK.

Rodong Sinmun Saturday observes in a commentary:

Pretending to know about world politics better than any others, the U.S. is apt to advise other legitimate sovereign states, behaving as if it were an international judge. However, it is now arguing pros and cons as regards its foreign policy, thus becoming a laughing stock of world people.

The U.S. hostile policy toward the DPRK is bound to go bust as it is anachronistic and unrealistic and a manifestation of ignorance.

If the politicians of the U.S. do not give up their inveterate repugnance and hostile policy toward towards the DPRK, they will certainly make a political mistake.

It is a tragedy that the U.S. is still locked in its family quarrel, failing to know what it should do, though it is the country which compelled the DPRK to have access to nukes.

The DPRK will do what it should do, regardless of whether the U.S. politicians waste their time, playing a wordplay, pursuant to their ridiculous hostile policy toward the former.

The more absent-mindedly the U.S. waste its time, the more elite the DPRK's powerful nuclear deterrent will become.

The U.S. would be well advised to make a policy switchover, though belatedly, awake from its anachronistic daydream of inviting shame and ruin.