He said in the article that he could not repress anger at Obama's evil remarks about the DPRK on January 22.

The article went on:

Obama's remarks are a hysteric one by a man upset by the failure of the policy to stifle the DPRK.

The National Defence Commission of the DPRK in its statement on February 4 said as follows:

If the U.S. ignites a war of aggression against the DPRK by conventional forces, the latter will fight the former by conventional forces of its style, if the former unleashes a nuclear war against the latter, it will counter with its own nuclear strikes, and if the former tries to bring down the latter through a cyber warfare, it will react with its own preeminent cyber warfare and will thus bring earlier the final ruin of the U.S. This is a decisive option of the DPRK.

The U.S. had better clearly know that the DPRK's smaller, precision and diversified nuclear strike means and ground, naval, underwater, air and cyber warfare means will be used through the service personnel and people's display of the strongest mental power and indomitable ideology and will which the gangster-like U.S. imperialists can never think of and by the Juche-oriented strategy and tactics and unique war methods unprecedented in human history of wars.

The declaration fully reflects the stand of the DPRK.

I support the stand of the DPRK.

It is the natural right of an independent country to fight against aggression by the imperialists.