Noting that the American politicians persistently vociferate about "story of threat from north Korea", the article went on:

It is foolish sophism that a super power is "threatened" by a small country.

The U.S. is the biggest possessor of nukes and a country that boasts of holding military edge in the world.

As for "threat", it is the word which the DPRK should say to the U.S.

The U.S. has posed extreme threat to the DPRK with nukes for more than half a century.

The leadership of north Korea put forward the new line of simultaneously pushing forward economic construction and the building of nuclear force to cope with the U.S. moves for a nuclear war and it decided the final showdown with the U.S.

The army of the DPRK is the army strong in idea and faith which no army can match. It is just the Korean People's Army in which all the service personnel and the supreme commander have united in single mind with the same intention and they fully carry out the supreme commander's order.

North Korea is a country fully prepared for attack and defence though the U.S. vociferates about military and technical supremacy.

Then has the U.S. any good method to cope with the "nuclear threat" from north Korea which may destroy the U.S.?

No matter how many interceptor missiles and THAAD the U.S. may produce and deploy in south Korea, it is useless.

The only way for the U.S. is not to provoke north Korea. That is to say, the U.S. should drop hostile policy toward north Korea, withdraw its troops from south Korea and not interfere in the internal affairs of the Korean nation.