They are asking their U.S. master for regular fielding of strategic assets on the Korean peninsula.

Now underway every day are confabs over the proposal of making it routine the deployment of the U.S. strategic bombers on the Korean peninsula from Guam and the U.S. mainland and their maintenance in the peninsula, and the proposal for the deployment and permanent fielding of ultra-modern reconnaissance plane, Aegis destroyer, nuclear submarine and nuclear carrier strike groups.

They have gone so busy to introduce the U.S. ultra-modern hardware that even U.S. President Trump disclosed an intention for arms sale, hinting at "allowing south Korea to purchase sophisticated military hardware".

Assertions about "going nuclear" are heard from the puppet forces amid the building up of the opinion over the redeployment of the U.S. tactical nuclear weapons.

Puppet Defense Minister Song Yong Mu and others are revealing practical movement after stressing the need to "examine" the issue of the redeployment of the U.S. tactical nuclear weapons.

The conservative forces including Free Korea Party are going busy, calling for "10 million signature campaign" and sending a letter to the U.S. president, talking about "nearly equal opinion over nuclear weaponization" and stressing the "need to establish stable order of nuclear balance".

The essence of the puppet forces' racket is that "the DPRK achieved the nuclear monopolization on the Korean peninsula through the development of nuclear weapons known as an absolute weapon and this has posed threats to the existence of south Korea and its people".

They are unaware of the essence of the issue of bolstering the state nuclear force and also fail to foresee the consequences to be entailed by their racket. This leads to a conclusion that they are puppet forces in every aspect.

The puppet forces stress the necessity for the redeployment of the U.S. tactical nuclear weapons and for them to "go nuclear on their own", and this will only result in acknowledging the DPRK's position as a nuclear weapons state which they have so far denied with all efforts.

This will, on the other hand, bring into bolder relief the wretched situation of the stooges who can not fire even a bullet, to say nothing of supporting themselves without "protection" or approval by the U.S.

The call for redeployment of the U.S. tactical nuclear weapons and the assertion of "going nuclear on their own" will cause more serious problem.

In case south Korea upsets the nuclear balance in the region and opts for "going nuclear" in the face of huge economic, political and military challenges from neighboring countries for the humiliating THAAD deployment, the ensuing danger will be beyond imagination.

What matters here is the true aim sought by the U.S. in talking about "tightening alliance" and offer of a nuclear umbrella.

The U.S. magazine "National Interest" website, reporting Trump's assertions made during election campaign that he would not doggedly oppose Japan and south Korea going nuclear independently, commented that even though it could not be considered the most ideal method, it could be much wiser way than letting the U.S. continue to stand at the outpost line of the disastrous confrontation. The magazine added that now it is necessary to hand over the danger to countries that regard it as the most important interests to deter the DPRK.

So poor is the despicable behavior of the puppet forces going desperate to keep the Pandora's box, being unaware of whom their destiny depend on.

Written by Ri Kyong Ju