Recently the British newspaper Independent cited detailed data to convey the fact. According to it, a public prosecutor of the International Criminal Court declared that he would conduct investigation into persons responsible for the crimes against humanity committed by the U.S. in Afghanistan. Presenting the massacre of more than 10 000 civilians by the U.S. there from 2007 to 2011 as typical evidence, he brought the lawsuit against the U.S. with the organization, pressing for a legitimate investigation into the case.

The commentary says it is unusual that the prosecutor of the ICC brought a lawsuit against the U.S., adding the reason is because the U.S. crimes are so serious and can no longer be connived at.

The massacre of peaceable citizens by the U.S. forces in Afghanistan was something beyond imagination, notes the commentary, and goes on:

It is quite natural that the U.S. should be brought to the ICC and face legal punishment as it is the world's worst human rights abuser which committed the hideous crimes against humanity through the massacre of civilians in Afghanistan under the pretext of a "war on terrorism" in breach of international law.

What matters is that this human rights abuser country faulted other countries' "human rights issue" whenever an opportunity presented itself and published "human rights report" every year to take issue with human rights performance in various countries, while styling itself a "human rights judge".

Recently it has hyped up the non-existent "human rights issue" in the DPRK and malignantly slandered it.

It is the height of impudence and a mockery of genuine human rights for the human rights abuser U.S. to find fault with the DPRK in which genuine human rights are guaranteed.

The U.S. had better mind its own business, before getting so impudent as to vociferate about the "human rights" of others.