Chinese Global Times quoted analysts as saying "Yoon’s overwhelming pro-U.S. policy could become nightmare for south Korea, with losses to outweigh gains".

The paper said "south Korea's new nuclear deterrence agreement with the U.S. that could allow Washington to dispatch a nuclear ballistic missile submarine to south Korea has drawn strong criticism from its neighboring countries".

It continued:

Experts said deploying U.S. nuclear weapons on the Korea peninsula is an extremely dangerous and provocative act toward China, Russia and north Korea. And that Washington and Seoul will face strategic level retaliation which could spark another nuclear crisis in the region.

A military expert said that the U.S. "extended deterrence" strategy is not for defending its ally south Korea but an approach to use north Korea's military development as a pretext to deploy U.S. strategic assets, including nuclear weapons, to impose more strategic pressures to China, Russia and north Korea.

This will do nothing good for the denuclearization of the peninsula but make the situation worse and also seriously threaten the security of China, Russia and north Korea. Like the one in Europe, the U.S. is likely to use the Korean peninsula nuclear issue to provoke another crisis in Asia, but China and Russia will not allow the U.S. to do so.

If Seoul ignores such warnings and completely executes U.S. order for "extended deterrence" in the region, south Korea will likely face retaliation, said experts. This could become a "nightmare" for Yoon and his country, and the protection and investment provided by the U.S. are not worth the loss that south Korea will suffer in terms of both economy and security, they noted.

They said that Yoon's latest remarks completely confuse right and wrong and his increasingly extreme pro-U.S. foreign policy could destabilize the Korean Peninsula and that the so-called "extended deterrence" would only provoke Pyongyang to implement its principle of "might for might, frontal match".

It is the U.S.-south Korea military exercises that escalate regional tensions, the Chinese newspaper said, quoting a foreign analyst on Korean affairs as saying in a news commentary on China Global TV Network "public opposition to Yoon's diplomatic strategy is rampant. And south Korea will get nothing for its unbalanced diplomatic approach entirely dependent on the U.S."

The Russian magazine the International Affairs carried the following article titled "U.S.-south Korea: Nuclear deterrence against the DPRK instead of talks" by a senior researcher of the China and Modern Asia Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences:

Yoon Suk Yeol's visit to the U.S. had been carefully prepared for a long time.

However, the results of the visit were disappointing.

The main topic of the "talks" was the "deterrence" against the DPRK, which would not improve the security situation in Northeast Asia at all.

The U.S. and south Korea are planning to form a bilateral "Nuclear Consultative Group" at an early date, start discussions on nuclear and strategic plans in this way, conduct frequent military drills in the field of nuclear deterrence on the Korean peninsula and, at the same time, make U.S. strategic nuclear submarines equipped with nuclear ballistic missiles regularly call at south Korean ports.

Such situation has arisen for the first time in the last 40 years.

Strangely enough, Biden stressed that the "U.S. is seeking to make a diplomatic breakthrough in the relations with the DPRK" as regards the results of the recent "talks". However, no matter what breakthrough he may make, the U.S. nuclear obligation to south Korea won't be affected. And moreover, he openly threatened the DPRK.

As seen above, the Biden administration is acting in a quite contrary direction, far from seeking talks on building military confidence.

In conclusion, Yoon Suk Yeol's visit to the U.S. showed that the U.S. and its followers made big retrogression over the issue of security of the Korean peninsula and Northeast Asia.

China Daily in an article titled "Washington ensnares Yoon into geopolitical trap" said Yoon Suk Yeol 's visit to the United States could have far-reaching impacts on the future of the peninsula and that of the region, and perhaps, in some ways, of the world at large.

It commented that the "Washington Declaration" and the "joint statement" which Yoon claims as a "bountiful harvest" appear to be potentially lethal, and there has been complaint that Yoon may have just submitted semiconductors, among other things, to U.S. control.

Unless the new agreement is completely withdrawn, it will deal a massive blow to the south Korean economy, apart from poisoning its overall relations with China, the paper said, adding he has allowed south Korea to be sucked further into the U.S.' "Indo-Pacific" strategy.

South Korean puppet media and experts are also becoming increasingly vocal denouncing puppet traitor Yoon Suk Yeol's visit to the U.S. as a traitor's war-oriented visit to turn the Korean peninsula into the theater of a nuclear war.

The south Korean newspaper Hangyore noted that the regular exhibition of U.S. strategic means entering the Korean peninsula will not serve as "expanded deterrence" but as "extended crisis".

Recalling that deployment of a U.S. strategic nuclear submarine was confirmed by the high-profile "Washington Declaration", the newspaper quoted the U.S. Pacific air force commander as saying at an interview with Japanese media that U.S. strategic bombers will regularly conduct operations in and around the peninsula and land in south Korea.

It is abnormal for a strategic nuclear submarine operating underwater to surface and enter a south Korean port, and for a strategic nuclear bomber operating in the air to land on the soil of south Korea, it said, voicing concern that such military action of the U.S. and south Korea will spark sensitive reaction from the neighboring countries and deepen tensions and crisis.

An executive member of the Solidarity for Culture of puppet south Korea said that Yoon seems to struggle hard for the sole purpose of making south Korea "a country needed by the U.S.", irrespective of the security of people, geo-political stability, peace on the peninsula and retaliation by neighboring countries and many other factors, quoting the public as saying that the "diplomatic disaster" of Yoon's regime continues and it is "self-ruining diplomacy." The member noted that foreign media and experts on diplomacy and security and even pro-U.S. conservatives in south Korea were stunned by Yoon's behavior.

South Korean websites are deluged with articles deriding Yoon's visit to the U.S. as a war-inviting visit to complete the U.S.-Japan-south Korea triangular military alliance. They called for bringing down pro-U.S. warmonger Yoon who is inviting a nuclear war, commenting that Yoon earned an ill fame for his "top-notch" evil rule such as pro-U.S. and pro-Japanese flunkeyism, treachery, corruption, incompetence, anti-worker and anti-people policy, fascism and warmongering.

Others censure his visit, branding him as "an idiot taking the lead with a rifle in executing the U.S. war strategy", saying "if Yoon is left intact, a war will break out and south Korea will be exposed to a shower of attacks", "it is as fool as a wart standing against a cart to level a gun at the nuclear and missile power," "one can not but wonder about Yoon's behavior of trusting even a thief", and "the recent U.S. visit would lead Yoon to a grave".

The internet media Voice of Seoul derided the wretched plight of puppet traitor Yoon having a hard time for his wild act, saying:

Outwardly the ruling party seems to be indifferent to Yoon's submissive diplomacy toward Japan and wild rhetoric of "ironclad trust" in the U.S. over its wiretapping, but it is jittery inwardly and is lamenting with deep sigh. In less than a year in office Yoon has made naught of everything. Economy went bankrupt with increasing debts.

He is hyping up his considerable successes during his visit to the U.S. but what he achieved is not as good as it looks.

He seemed to have miscalculated that everything will turn out OK if he holds hands with Kishida and Biden. But only yawning comes out at the thought of what convinced Yoon and the ruling party of a victory in the next year's "general election".

Voters are the people on this land, not Kishida and Biden.

The ruling party is seething because Yoon has gone too much. No wonder, he is ruining even economy, diplomacy and security.