Shortly ago, I stressed that the reactionary alliance policy of boasted by the U.S. administration might be a key factor driving the U.S. into a strategic dilemma.

However, the U.S. is being wrapped in mystery unreservedly, persistently seeking the tightened confrontational alliance targeting the third party.

It is a typical example that high-ranking officials of the U.S. administration are touring the Asia-Pacific region amid the protracted Ukrainian situation and the uncontrollable armed conflict in the Middle East region.

Anybody with a view of the world political situation and the Indo-Pacific strategy pursued by the U.S. can clearly tell about what is the aim of the visits of the U.S. secretaries of State and Defense and there is no need for any other interpretation.

The present situation clearly proves that the real intention of the U.S. advocating "dialogue" and "maintenance of stable relations" with a hostile country is to implement the line of confrontation and deterrence at will by minimizing the rebound of its other party who may put it in a tight corner.

What should not be overlooked is that uninvited guests from across ocean will seek the extreme confrontation on the Korean peninsula which is the biggest hotspot in the world and has reached the height of explosion.

In the region of the south Korean puppets, U.S. Secretary of State Blinken is to hold a confab with the puppets over the issue of the DPRK's sovereignty. U.S. Secretary of Defense Austin is to host a U.S.-puppet south Korea annual security consultative meeting and the defense ministerial talks of the puppet south Korea- "UN Command" membership to discuss proposals for the military confrontation with the DPRK.

The U.S. is going to hold even a meeting of military chiefs of the "UN Command" membership, a product of the Korean war in the 1950s, not content with discussing the confrontation proposals for politically doing harm to the DPRK and militarily pressurizing the DPRK. This provocative act reminds one of the visits of the warmongers for field inspection to ignite the second Korean war.

Given the historic precedents in which the political and military confrontation and conflict have been escalated in the places where the U.S. footprints are left, there is no doubt that the recent visits of the U.S. secretaries of State and Defense will bring about a new war cloud in the Asia-Pacific region, too.

What is clear is that any rhetoric and adventurous act can not cover up the miserable position of the U.S. which is plunging into a strategic crisis in different parts of the world and halt the decline of the "only superpower" becoming more evident day by day.

The failure of the domestic and foreign policies and the subsequent strategic crisis have already become an inevitable fate of the U.S., and such scenery is being unfolded vividly in Europe and Middle East.

Whether or not a new geopolitical crisis hastening the end of the U.S. will be created in the Asia-Pacific region entirely depends on the U.S. behavior.

The U.S. moves to strengthen the alliance against the anti-U.S., independent countries will accelerate the just international community's punishment power and conclusion of counteraction and serve as a catalyst for totally destroying the hegemonic position of the empire of evils.

The present international crisis is the one of the U.S. and its strategic defeat is a matter of time.